[dcl.init] Remove redundant specification of when value-initialization occurs

Author: sdkrystian

source/declarations.tex

@@ -4320,31 +4320,6 @@
 In some cases, additional initialization is done later.
 \end{note}
 
-\pnum
-An object whose initializer is an empty set of parentheses, i.e.,
-\tcode{()},
-shall be
-value-initialized.
-
-\indextext{ambiguity!function declaration}%
-\begin{note}
-Since
-\tcode{()}
-is not permitted by the syntax for
-\grammarterm{initializer},
-\begin{codeblock}
-X a();
-\end{codeblock}
-is not the declaration of an object of class
-\tcode{X},
-but the declaration of a function taking no argument and returning an
-\tcode{X}.
-The form
-\tcode{()}
-is permitted in certain other initialization contexts~(\ref{expr.new},
-\ref{expr.type.conv}, \ref{class.base.init}).
-\end{note}
-
 \pnum
 If no initializer is specified for an object, the object is default-initialized.
 
@@ -4425,6 +4400,25 @@
 \tcode{wchar_t},
 and the initializer is a \grammarterm{string-literal}, see~\ref{dcl.init.string}.
 \item If the initializer is \tcode{()}, the object is value-initialized.
+\indextext{ambiguity!function declaration}%
+\begin{note}
+Since
+\tcode{()}
+is not permitted by the syntax for
+\grammarterm{initializer},
+\begin{codeblock}
+X a();
+\end{codeblock}
+is not the declaration of an object of class
+\tcode{X},
+but the declaration of a function taking no argument and returning an
+\tcode{X}.
+The form
+\tcode{()}
+is permitted in certain other initialization contexts~(\ref{expr.new},
+\ref{expr.type.conv}, \ref{class.base.init}).
+\end{note}
+
 \item
 Otherwise, if the destination type is an array,
 the object is initialized as follows.