From c3d17030a4f34f17c6ba75700eb92bfac4c550e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Magnus Madsen <magnus-madsen@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 09:28:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] feat: update FAQ

---
 src/page/Faq.js | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/page/Faq.js b/src/page/Faq.js
index a8327b4..1212396 100644
--- a/src/page/Faq.js
+++ b/src/page/Faq.js
@@ -608,6 +608,21 @@ class Faq extends Component {
                     </Answer>
                 </QA>
 
+                <QA>
+                    <Question>
+                        Interesting project but whoever decided "forM" is a good name for a language keyword should be made to gurgle Tabasco sauce for a few minutes.
+                    </Question>
+                    <Answer>
+                        <p>
+                            We much prefer <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cholula_Hot_Sauce">Cholula Hot Sauce.</a>
+                        </p>
+                        <p>
+                            That said, <code>forM</code> is clear, concise, and works well with <code>forA</code> allowing one to easily switch
+                            between monadic-code and applicative-code.
+                        </p>
+                    </Answer>
+                </QA>
+
                 <QA>
                     <Question>
                         How the fuck can anyone understand such weird syntax? I hate all these symbols.