GH-141861: Fix TRACE_RECORD if full (GH-141959)

Author: sergey-miryanov

Lib/test/test_sys.py

@@ -2254,7 +2254,7 @@ def frame_3_jit() -> None:
                 # 1 extra iteration for tracing.
                 for i in range(_testinternalcapi.TIER2_THRESHOLD + 2):
                     # Careful, doing this in the reverse order breaks tracing:
-                    expected = {enabled} and i >= _testinternalcapi.TIER2_THRESHOLD + 1
+                    expected = {enabled} and i >= _testinternalcapi.TIER2_THRESHOLD
                     assert sys._jit.is_active() is expected
                     frame_2_jit(expected)
                     assert sys._jit.is_active() is expected

Python/bytecodes.c

@@ -3018,7 +3018,7 @@ dummy_func(
                 goto stop_tracing;
             }
             PyCodeObject *code = _PyFrame_GetCode(frame);
-            _PyExecutorObject *executor = code->co_executors->executors[this_instr->op.arg];
+            _PyExecutorObject *executor = code->co_executors->executors[oparg & 255];
             assert(executor->vm_data.index == INSTR_OFFSET() - 1);
             assert(executor->vm_data.code == code);
             assert(executor->vm_data.valid);
@@ -5650,7 +5650,7 @@ dummy_func(
                 LEAVE_TRACING();
                 int err = stop_tracing_and_jit(tstate, frame);
                 ERROR_IF(err < 0);
-                DISPATCH_GOTO_NON_TRACING();
+                DISPATCH();
             }
             // Super instructions. Instruction deopted. There's a mismatch in what the stack expects
             // in the optimizer. So we have to reflect in the trace correctly.