`with` is documented but not provided

[greghendershott]

I tried to use with (for a CTE) but got an undefined error.

Glancing at the commit history I see:

• commit a58ca7b added with
• commit fdba335 removed with but left it in the documentation
• commit d6823de updated the documentation about an enhancement

I may be overlooking something. I'm not sure the intent -- does the reality needs to change to match the docs, or vice versa.

[rmculpepper]

with is still allowed in a statement, but it's no longer a Racket macro like select. It means you have to write (sql (with ....)) instead of just (with ....).

[greghendershott]

Oh!

1. That's awesome it's available, I just tried and it worked great!

2. Should I make a PR to add that to the doc for with --- as a margin-note or inline prose? Or should it be some change to the grammar? (Or do you think it's already apparent and I'm just being dense -- which is 100% just to tell me bluntly. 😄)