Skip to content

Conversation

@picccard
Copy link
Contributor

  • allow user to select what logs are included
  • less repeated code

@picccard picccard marked this pull request as draft June 24, 2024 12:37
@DCMattyG
Copy link
Contributor

Would something similar to what you're doing for the App Services deployment also apply to the Function App deployment as well?

@DCMattyG DCMattyG self-assigned this Jun 26, 2024
@picccard
Copy link
Contributor Author

picccard commented Jun 26, 2024

Yes, that is true. The reasoning behind this is that the appServicePlan sku P1v3 is quite expensive (when testing / proof-of-consept), and it can not scale down to sku B1 without first removing any "premuim sku dignostic settings".

So both diagSettings and sku names is something I would like to choose myself as I'm deploying.

@DCMattyG
Copy link
Contributor

While that is true, I've done extensive testing and the Engine container is extremely resource intensive due to the numerous calculations it performs. Reducing the SKU is highly discouraged because it has a quite negative impact on the performance of the solution.

I'm not opposed to this, but perhaps we'll need some documentation explaining that while you CAN lower the SKU, we can only guarantee performance when using SKU's X/Y/Z, for example. I'm trying to avoid numerous GitHub issues related to performance when end users have knowingly chosen a SKU that will impact the performance of the IPAM solution.

I hope that makes sense...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants