-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Fix test coverage regression by updating import paths and test files #13
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @ipv1337, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request addresses a code coverage regression by updating import statements in test files and incorporating improved test versions. The primary goal is to restore and enhance code coverage levels while ensuring all tests pass reliably. The changes include updating import statements in test files to use direct imports from src.cli_code instead of cli_code, using improved test files from the test_dir/improved directory, adding BaseTool tests in coverage scripts, fixing failing assertions in Gemini model tests, and updating the tools coverage script to include all necessary tool tests. The result is an increase in overall tools coverage to 95.26% with excellent coverage for individual components.
Highlights
- Import Path Correction: Updated import statements in test files to use direct imports from
src.cli_codeto ensure proper coverage tracking. - Test Suite Enhancement: Incorporated improved test files from the
test_dir/improveddirectory to enhance test reliability and coverage. - Coverage Improvement: Added BaseTool tests in coverage scripts to improve coverage of the base tool class.
- Bug Fix: Fixed failing assertions in the Gemini model tests.
- Test Script Update: Updated tools coverage script to include all the necessary tool tests.
Changelog
- scripts/tools_coverage.sh
- Modified the pytest command for system_tools tests to include
test_dir/test_system_tools.pyand specify theTestSystemToolsclass intest_dir/test_tools_basic.py. - This change aims to improve coverage for system tools.
- Modified the pytest command for system_tools tests to include
- test_dir/test_system_tools.py
- Added
import osto the imports. - Modified the BashTool initialization test to check if the description contains 'Execute a bash command' instead of an exact match.
- Modified the
test_bash_tool_timeoutfunction to use a timeout of 1 second instead of 1000 milliseconds.
- Added
- test_dir/test_tools_basic.py
- Updated import statements to use direct imports from
src.cli_code.toolsinstead ofcli_code.toolsfor all tool classes. - This change ensures proper coverage tracking.
- Updated import statements to use direct imports from
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
In tests, coverage we seek,
With imports direct and sleek,
Bugs we defeat,
Coverage complete,
A codebase robust and unique.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This PR aims to fix code coverage regression by updating import statements and test files. The changes seem well-structured and the test results indicate improved coverage. However, there are a few areas that could be improved for clarity and efficiency.
Summary of Findings
- Test Description Clarity: Some test descriptions could be more descriptive to clearly convey the purpose of the test.
- Timeout Value: The timeout value in
test_bash_tool_timeoutis set to 1 second. Consider if this is sufficient for all test environments or if it should be configurable. - Redundant Imports: The
subprocessmodule is imported twice intest_system_tools.py. Remove the redundant import.
Merge Readiness
The pull request improves code coverage and addresses the identified regression. However, addressing the comments regarding test description clarity, timeout value, and redundant imports would further enhance the quality of the code. I am unable to directly approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging. I recommend that the pull request not be merged until the high severity issues are addressed (at a minimum).
| import os | ||
| import pytest | ||
| from unittest.mock import patch, MagicMock | ||
| import subprocess |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| tool = BashTool() | ||
| result = tool.execute("sleep 10", timeout=1000) # 1 second timeout | ||
| result = tool.execute("sleep 10", timeout=1) # 1 second timeout |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Coverage Report📊 Current Coverage: 85.00% Detailed coverage analysis is available in SonarCloud Coverage Change DetailsThis shows code coverage for changes in this PR. To improve coverage, consider adding tests for new or modified code. |
Code Coverage Report📊 Current Coverage: 85.00% Detailed coverage analysis is available in SonarCloud Coverage Change DetailsThis shows code coverage for changes in this PR. To improve coverage, consider adding tests for new or modified code. |
Code Coverage Report📊 Current Coverage: 85.00% Detailed coverage analysis is available in SonarCloud Coverage Change DetailsThis shows code coverage for changes in this PR. To improve coverage, consider adding tests for new or modified code. |
|



Overview
This PR fixes the code coverage regression by updating the import statements in test files and using improved test versions.
Changes
src.cli_codeinstead ofcli_codeto ensure proper coverage trackingtest_dir/improveddirectoryTest Results
Why It's Needed
The code coverage had regressed due to import paths not being correctly set for coverage tracking. These changes restore and improve the coverage levels while ensuring all tests pass reliably.
Fixes the coverage regression issues previously identified.