Fix: Restore accurate test coverage reporting in CI pipeline #14
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @ipv1337, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request addresses inaccuracies in test coverage reporting within the CI pipeline. The primary changes involve removing a restrictive 'include' section in the .coveragerc file, modifying the CI workflow to utilize actual coverage percentages instead of a hardcoded value, and ensuring that test failures result in build failures by setting CI_EXIT_ON_TEST_FAILURE to 1. The removal of the include section will allow for more comprehensive coverage reporting across the project.
Highlights
- Coverage Configuration: The restrictive 'include' section has been removed from
.coveragercto allow for complete coverage reporting. - CI Workflow: The CI workflow now uses actual coverage percentages instead of a hardcoded 85% threshold.
- Test Failure Handling:
CI_EXIT_ON_TEST_FAILUREis now set to 1, ensuring that test failures will cause the build to fail.
Changelog
- .coveragerc
- Removed the 'include' section (lines 3-5) to allow coverage reporting for all files under the source directory.
- pr_description.md
- The entire file has been removed. This file appears to be a previous attempt to address coverage issues, but is no longer relevant with the current changes.
- scripts/run_coverage_ci.sh
- Changed
CI_EXIT_ON_TEST_FAILUREfrom 0 to 1 (line 13) to ensure the CI pipeline fails when tests fail.
- Changed
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
A test's green light,
A build that does not fail,
Code coverage soars.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This PR addresses an important issue by restoring accurate test coverage reporting in the CI pipeline. The changes made are well-described and seem reasonable. The removal of the restrictive 'include' section in .coveragerc, the modification of the CI workflow to use actual coverage percentages, and the change to CI_EXIT_ON_TEST_FAILURE are all positive steps. However, I have a few comments to ensure the changes are robust and maintainable.
Summary of Findings
- Missing Documentation Update: The removal of the
includesection from.coveragercshould be reflected in the project's documentation, if any exists, to avoid confusion for other developers. - Clarity of Commit Message: While the PR description is clear, the individual commit messages could be more descriptive to improve traceability and understanding of the changes.
Merge Readiness
The PR seems to address the stated issue effectively. However, before merging, it would be beneficial to ensure that the documentation is updated to reflect the changes in .coveragerc and that the commit messages are clear and descriptive. I am unable to approve this pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging.
| omit = | ||
| */.rules/* | ||
| */.venv/* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding a comment explaining why the include section was removed. This can help future developers understand the reasoning behind the change and prevent accidental reintroduction of the section.
Code Coverage Report📊 Current Coverage: 31.58% Detailed coverage analysis is available in SonarCloud Coverage Change DetailsThis shows code coverage for changes in this PR. To improve coverage, consider adding tests for new or modified code. |
|
This PR fixes the test coverage configuration to ensure accurate reporting in the CI pipeline. Changes made: 1. Removed the restrictive 'include' section from .coveragerc which was limiting coverage to only two files 2. Modified the CI workflow to use actual coverage percentages instead of hardcoded 85% 3. Changed CI_EXIT_ON_TEST_FAILURE to 1 to ensure test failures cause the build to fail