Fix: more missing coverage #18
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @ipv1337, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request addresses a missing coverage issue in the test suite. Specifically, it modifies the test_setup_error function in tests/test_main.py to correctly assert that the CLI command exits with a zero exit code and that the expected error message is present in the output when an exception is raised during the setup process. The previous implementation was using pytest.raises which was not correctly capturing the output and exit code.
Highlights
- Test Fix: The pull request fixes a test case (
test_setup_error) to properly assert the exit code and output when an exception occurs during the CLI setup command. - Coverage Improvement: This change improves test coverage by ensuring that error handling during the setup process is adequately tested.
Changelog
- tests/test_main.py
- Modified
test_setup_errorto removepytest.raisescontext manager. - Modified
test_setup_errorto assertresult.exit_code == 0. - Modified
test_setup_errorto assert that 'Error saving API Key' is inresult.output.
- Modified
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
A test that fails,
A bug that prevails,
Coverage we seek,
Till the code speaks,
And the error unveils.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request addresses a missing coverage issue in the test_setup_error function. The changes involve removing the pytest.raises context manager and adding assertions for result.exit_code and result.output. This approach allows the test to verify the expected behavior when an exception is raised during the setup command.
Summary of Findings
- Exception Handling in Tests: The original test used
pytest.raisesto assert that an exception was raised. The updated test usescli_runner.invokewithcatch_exceptions=Falseand asserts the exit code and output. This change provides more control over the test and allows for more specific assertions.
Merge Readiness
The changes appear to address the missing coverage issue and provide a more robust test for the setup command when an error occurs. The pull request is ready to be merged, but please have others review and approve this code before merging, as I am unable to approve it directly.
|
|
||
| with pytest.raises(Exception, match="Test error"): | ||
| result = cli_runner.invoke(cli, ["setup", "--provider", "gemini", "test-api-key"]) | ||
| result = cli_runner.invoke(cli, ["setup", "--provider", "gemini", "test-api-key"], catch_exceptions=False) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using catch_exceptions=False is a good way to allow the test to proceed even when an exception is raised. This allows you to assert the exit code and output.
Consider adding a comment explaining why catch_exceptions=False is used here, as it's not the default behavior.
result = cli_runner.invoke(cli, ["setup", "--provider", "gemini", "test-api-key"], catch_exceptions=False) # Allows us to assert the exit code and output even when an exception is raised| assert result.exit_code == 0 | ||
| assert "Error saving API Key" in result.output |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The assertions for result.exit_code == 0 and "Error saving API Key" in result.output ensure that the command exits without an error code and that the expected error message is present in the output.
Consider adding a more specific assertion for the error message to avoid false positives. For example, you could assert that the output contains the specific error message raised by the mock.
| assert result.exit_code == 0 | |
| assert "Error saving API Key" in result.output | |
| assert result.exit_code == 0 | |
| assert "Error saving API Key: Test error" in result.output # More specific assertion |
Code Coverage Report📊 Current Coverage: 31.58% Detailed coverage analysis is available in SonarCloud Coverage Change DetailsThis shows code coverage for changes in this PR. To improve coverage, consider adding tests for new or modified code. |
|
…nges