Docs: update testing workarounds #23
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @ipv1337, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request updates the TESTING.md documentation file to include a section on known test workarounds related to the Gemini agent loop and mock API response structures. It provides guidance for developers writing or updating tests that involve sequential tool calls or specific model response processing.
Highlights
- Documentation Update: Adds a new section to
TESTING.mddetailing known workarounds for testing the Gemini agent loop. - Gemini Agent Loop: Explains limitations in handling sequences of tool calls and how tests in
tests/models/test_gemini.pyhave been modified to accommodate these limitations. - Mock API Responses: Describes adjustments made to mock API response structures to handle the model's specific response processing.
Changelog
- docs/TESTING.md
- Added a section on 'Known Test Workarounds'.
- Documented Gemini agent loop issues and related test modifications.
- Explained adjustments to mock API response structures for specific tests.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
A loop's strange way,
Tests adjust, come what may,
Mocks help us see.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request updates the TESTING.md documentation to include information about known test workarounds, specifically related to Gemini agent loop issues and mock API response structures. This is a helpful addition for developers working with the testing framework.
Merge Readiness
The documentation update seems straightforward and helpful for developers working with the testing framework. Since there are no critical or high severity issues, the pull request seems ready to be merged, but please address the medium severity issue. I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging.
| 1. **Gemini Agent Loop Issues**: The Gemini agent loop has limitations in handling sequences of tool calls. | ||
| - Several tests in `tests/models/test_gemini.py` have modified assertions to accommodate these limitations: | ||
| - `test_generate_simple_tool_call` has commented-out assertions for the second tool execution (`mock_task_complete_tool.execute`) and final result check. | ||
| - History count assertions are adjusted to reflect actual behavior rather than ideal behavior. | ||
| - When writing new tests that involve sequential tool calls, be aware of these limitations and adjust assertions accordingly. | ||
| - If you're improving the agent loop functionality, consult `TODO_gemini_loop.md` for details on remaining issues. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding a link to the TODO_gemini_loop.md file directly in the sentence. This would allow developers to quickly navigate to the file and understand the remaining issues. Also, consider adding a brief summary of the issues mentioned in the TODO file, to provide context without requiring the reader to open another file.
Code Coverage Report📊 Current Coverage: 90.08% Detailed coverage analysis is available in SonarCloud Coverage Change DetailsThis shows code coverage for changes in this PR. To improve coverage, consider adding tests for new or modified code. |
|
No description provided.