Improve test coverage for tools modules and gemini model #7
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @ipv1337, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request focuses on improving the test coverage for the tools modules and the Gemini model. It achieves 100% coverage for system_tools.py and directory_tools.py, and improves coverage to 89.83% for file_tools.py. Additionally, it introduces new tests for the Gemini model, resulting in an overall tools directory coverage improvement to 54.91%. The changes to the Gemini model address an issue with how tool definitions are created, ensuring proper instantiation and handling of potential errors during the process.
Highlights
- Test Coverage Improvement: Increased test coverage for
system_tools.py,directory_tools.py, andfile_tools.py, enhancing the reliability and maintainability of these modules. - Gemini Model Testing: Added new tests for the Gemini model to ensure its proper functioning and integration with other components.
- Tool Definition Fix: Corrected an issue in the Gemini model's tool definition creation process, improving the robustness of tool usage.
Changelog
Click here to see the changelog
- src/cli_code/models/gemini.py
- Modified the
_create_tool_definitionsmethod to correctly instantiate tools from theAVAILABLE_TOOLSdictionary. - Added error handling to catch exceptions during tool instantiation, preventing the process from crashing.
- Included logging for debugging and warning messages to provide better insights into the tool definition creation process.
- Modified the
- test_dir/improved/test_quality_tools.py
- Added comprehensive tests for
quality_toolsmodule, covering successful command executions, error scenarios, timeout situations, and file not found cases. - Included tests for
LinterCheckerToolandFormatterToolwith default and custom parameters, ensuring their proper functioning. - Implemented tests to prevent parent directory traversal, enhancing security.
- Added comprehensive tests for
- test_dir/improved/test_summarizer_tool.py
- Added tests for
summarizer_toolmodule, covering various scenarios such as small and large files, file read errors, and summarization failures. - Included tests for handling empty large files and extracting text from successful and failed summarization responses.
- Implemented tests to prevent parent directory traversal and handle general exceptions during file processing.
- Added tests for
- test_dir/improved/test_tree_tool.py
- Added tests for
tree_toolmodule, covering successful command executions, custom path and depth configurations, and long output truncation. - Included tests for handling command not found errors, timeouts, and unexpected exceptions, with fallback mechanisms.
- Implemented tests for the fallback tree implementation, ensuring proper handling of non-existent paths and directories.
- Added tests for
- test_dir/test_directory_tools.py
- Added tests for
directory_toolsmodule, covering successful directory creation, handling existing directories, and preventing parent directory traversal. - Included tests for
LsToolwith default and custom paths, directory not found errors, and long output truncation. - Implemented tests for handling OS errors, unexpected exceptions, and command timeouts.
- Added tests for
- test_dir/test_file_tools.py
- Added tests for
file_toolsmodule, covering various scenarios forViewTool,EditTool,GrepTool, andGlobTool. - Included tests for handling file read errors, invalid arguments, and exceptions during file processing.
- Implemented tests to prevent parent directory traversal and ensure proper handling of directories and non-existent files.
- Added tests for
- test_dir/test_gemini_model.py
- Added tests for
GeminiModelto verify the creation of tool definitions, system prompts, and other functionalities. - Included tests for handling different scenarios and ensuring proper integration with other components.
- Added tests for
- test_dir/test_system_tools.py
- Added tests for
BashToolto verify successful command executions, error scenarios, and timeout situations. - Included tests for handling banned commands and general exceptions during command execution.
- Added tests for
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
In tests, we trust,
To catch bugs 'fore they combust,
Coverage high,
Code will fly,
Quality's what we adjust.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This PR improves test coverage for several modules and adds tests for the Gemini model. The changes look good overall, with a focus on increasing the robustness and reliability of the tools and model. The addition of exception handling and thorough mocking in the tests is commendable.
Summary of Findings
- Exception Handling in
_create_tool_definitions: The added exception handling in the_create_tool_definitionsmethod is good for robustness, but consider logging the full traceback for better debugging information. - Path Validation in Quality Tools: The quality tools include path validation to prevent parent directory traversal, which is a good security practice.
Merge Readiness
The pull request is well-structured and includes significant improvements to test coverage. The addition of exception handling and input validation enhances the robustness of the code. Overall, the changes are positive and contribute to the stability of the project. I am unable to approve the pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging. I recommend merging this PR after addressing the medium severity comment related to logging the full traceback in _create_tool_definitions.
| log.warning(f"Tool {tool_name} does not have a 'get_function_declaration' method. Skipping.") | ||
| log.warning(f"Tool {tool_name} does not have a 'get_function_declaration' method. Skipping.") | ||
| except Exception as e: | ||
| log.error(f"Error instantiating tool '{tool_name}': {e}") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider logging the exception with exc_info=True to include the traceback for more detailed debugging information.
log.error(f"Error instantiating tool '{tool_name}': {e}", exc_info=True)
Code Coverage Report📊 Current Coverage: 7.47% Detailed coverage analysis is available in SonarCloud Coverage Change DetailsThis shows code coverage for changes in this PR. To improve coverage, consider adding tests for new or modified code. |
Code Coverage Report📊 Current Coverage: 11.54% Detailed coverage analysis is available in SonarCloud Coverage Change DetailsThis shows code coverage for changes in this PR. To improve coverage, consider adding tests for new or modified code. |
Code Coverage Report📊 Current Coverage: 80.00% Detailed coverage analysis is available in SonarCloud Coverage Change DetailsThis shows code coverage for changes in this PR. To improve coverage, consider adding tests for new or modified code. |
Code Coverage Report📊 Current Coverage: 85.00% Detailed coverage analysis is available in SonarCloud Coverage Change DetailsThis shows code coverage for changes in this PR. To improve coverage, consider adding tests for new or modified code. |
|
Code Coverage Report📊 Current Coverage: 85.00% Detailed coverage analysis is available in SonarCloud Coverage Change DetailsThis shows code coverage for changes in this PR. To improve coverage, consider adding tests for new or modified code. |
Code Coverage Report📊 Current Coverage: 85.00% Detailed coverage analysis is available in SonarCloud Coverage Change DetailsThis shows code coverage for changes in this PR. To improve coverage, consider adding tests for new or modified code. |
Code Coverage Report📊 Current Coverage: 85.00% Detailed coverage analysis is available in SonarCloud Coverage Change DetailsThis shows code coverage for changes in this PR. To improve coverage, consider adding tests for new or modified code. |
Code Coverage Report📊 Current Coverage: 85.00% Detailed coverage analysis is available in SonarCloud Coverage Change DetailsThis shows code coverage for changes in this PR. To improve coverage, consider adding tests for new or modified code. |
This PR improves test coverage for several modules:\n\n- system_tools.py: 100% coverage\n- directory_tools.py: 100% coverage\n- file_tools.py: 89.83% coverage\n- Added tests for gemini model\n\nOverall tools directory coverage improved to 54.91%.