Skip to content

Conversation

@lvoliveira
Copy link
Contributor

Add a new job for sqlalchemy 2.0 and fixed all issues.

RFDAP-8594

Add a new job for sqlalchemy 2.0 and fixed all issues.

RFDAP-8594
@lvoliveira lvoliveira force-pushed the fb-RFDAP-8594-add-support-for-sqlalchemy20 branch from ef2aaa6 to c987a7a Compare October 13, 2025 20:28
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link

@ricardobz ricardobz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! 🚀

Copy link

@leogreal leogreal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

Copy link
Contributor

@lincrosenbach lincrosenbach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this change on format wanted?

from .field import Field
from .field import NestedAttributesField
from .field import NestedModelField
from .field import PrimaryKeyField
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not grouping imports anymore?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can change the rules, I have just run the linter and it updated the formatting. We are not running the lint step on CI. I'm submitting another PR to do that. But I can adjust that rule here already.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Humm, I checked here and that is done by the reorder_python_imports plugin configured on pre-commit. Check the formatting here. It already respect that rule.

I will keep the changes here and maybe we can think of opening a PR to change the use of reorder_python_imports and black by ruff and then we can configure other rules we want.

@lvoliveira lvoliveira merged commit 02b8de4 into master Oct 15, 2025
13 checks passed
@lvoliveira lvoliveira deleted the fb-RFDAP-8594-add-support-for-sqlalchemy20 branch October 15, 2025 17:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants