Relax dependency versions #8
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lukeburden
force-pushed
the
dependecy-upgrades
branch
from
fbc38ef to
a95cd94
Compare
miracle2k
added a commit
to miracle2k/onesky-python
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2017
Relax dependency versions
Author
|
@craig-jana @danob-jana @nowell-jana could be merged? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Having strict dependency versions makes it hard to use onesky-python in a larger project with lots of dependencies.
Requests uses semantic versioning, so onesky-python should theoretically not hit any compatibility issues with anything up to but not including their 3.0 release (which doesn't exist yet).
termcolor doesn't seem to change, but opening it up assuming semantic versioning too.