Skip to content

Conversation

@dweindl
Copy link
Member

@dweindl dweindl commented Mar 13, 2025

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.44%. Comparing base (0643389) to head (5502460).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #360   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    74.44%   74.44%           
========================================
  Files           57       57           
  Lines         5987     5987           
  Branches      1039     1039           
========================================
  Hits          4457     4457           
  Misses        1133     1133           
  Partials       397      397           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@dweindl dweindl self-assigned this Mar 13, 2025
@dweindl dweindl marked this pull request as ready for review March 17, 2025 08:19
@dweindl dweindl requested a review from a team as a code owner March 17, 2025 08:19
Copy link
Member

@dilpath dilpath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good 👍

The "module attributes" (ObjectivePriorType, InitializationPriorType) are listed on RTD but not doc'd -- is this because they might be refactored? Fine for me.

>>> Change(
... target_id="k1",
... operation_type=OperationType.SET_CURRENT_VALUE,
... target_value="10",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using "10" is fine but it looks like int/float is handled? Is this to stress that the type is an expression? Then maybe using e.g. k1+3 makes the point better.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's to test that strings are accepted/converted.

@dweindl
Copy link
Member Author

dweindl commented Mar 17, 2025

The "module attributes" (ObjectivePriorType, InitializationPriorType) are listed on RTD but not doc'd -- is this because they might be refactored? Fine for me.

That's because they are just aliases. Either we have separate types, or we only have the members of the original type documented. And yes, I wouldn't bother until it's decided whether/how they will change.

@dweindl dweindl merged commit 5b47448 into PEtab-dev:develop Mar 17, 2025
7 checks passed
@dweindl dweindl deleted the v2_apidoc branch March 17, 2025 15:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants