default claude and prettier repo level config

[kernelsam]

Issue number: senzing-garage/template-python#340 senzing-factory/build-resources#245

---

Resolves senzing-garage/template-python#340
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#245

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

Code Review Results

I'll analyze this PR against the review checklist. This PR adds Claude Code configuration files and updates VSCode settings.

Code Quality

✅ Code follows style guide

The changes are primarily configuration files (JSON and Markdown). All JSON files are properly formatted and follow standard conventions.

✅ No commented-out code

No commented-out code found. The removed comments from .vscode/cspell.json:2-6 were generic template comments, which is good practice to remove.

✅ Meaningful variable names

All configuration keys are clear and follow their respective tool conventions (includeCoAuthoredBy, defaultFormatter, etc.).

✅ DRY principle followed

No code duplication detected. Configuration is appropriately separated into different files by concern.

✅ No defects identified

The configuration files are syntactically correct and logically sound. The cspell.json changes alphabetize the word list, which improves maintainability.

⚠️ Project memory consideration

No .claude/CLAUDE.md file exists in the repository to consider. The new .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:3 file is appropriately generic and not environment-specific.

Testing

❌ No tests required

Configuration files don't require unit or integration tests. This section is not applicable to this PR.

Documentation

✅ README update not needed

The changes are internal development tooling configurations and don't affect user-facing functionality or require README updates.

✅ API docs update not needed

No API changes in this PR.

✅ Inline comments appropriate

Configuration files don't typically require inline comments. The removed comments from cspell.json were unnecessary boilerplate.

⚠️ CHANGELOG.md not updated

No CHANGELOG.md exists in the repository. If one exists elsewhere, consider documenting the addition of automated code review tooling.

✅ Markdown follows CommonMark

The new file .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md follows CommonMark specification and is properly formatted.

Security

✅ No hardcoded credentials

No credentials found in any of the changes.

✅ Input validation not applicable

These are static configuration files with no user input processing.

✅ Proper error handling not applicable

Configuration files don't contain executable code requiring error handling.

✅ No sensitive data in logs

No logging configuration or sensitive data present.

✅ No license files detected

No .lic files or AQAAAD strings found in the diff.

---

Summary

Overall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED with minor notes

Strengths:

1. Clean configuration additions that improve development workflow
2. Proper JSON formatting throughout
3. Alphabetized cspell.json word list improves maintainability
4. Removal of unnecessary comments makes files cleaner
5. Appropriate separation of concerns (local settings vs shared settings)
6. VSCode formatting settings will ensure consistent code style across the team

Notes:

1. .claude/settings.local.json - The filename suggests this is local config, but it's being committed. Verify this is intentional and not meant to be in .gitignore.
2. .vscode/settings.json:12 - "editor.formatOnSave": true will auto-format all files on save. Ensure the team is aware of this behavior change.
3. The word list in cspell.json was reordered alphabetically, which is good, but verify no words were accidentally removed during the sort.

Recommendations:

• Consider adding .claude/settings.local.json to .gitignore if it's meant for local development only
• Document the new /senzing-code-review command in the repository's main documentation
• Consider adding a CHANGELOG.md to track tooling improvements like this

---

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards