Skip to content

Conversation

@whoabuddy
Copy link
Contributor

we got a plan, man

@whoabuddy whoabuddy mentioned this pull request Jul 31, 2025
possible deploy issue with preview URLs, on the other hand if generated per PR maybe can remove?
@whoabuddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Noting we had to add migration and delete migration from #34 since we share the preview URL - next deployment from that PR will likely fail so we should close it out and revisit when ready.

@whoabuddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Noting we should add a fallback option to use the API websocket for new blocks instead of polling, that way we can at least get new block data, maybe backfill what's missing with rate limited calls, and avoid such a heavy load when things are down.

The design will also allow for multiple API keys to define accounts and multiple chainhooks per account so should be easier to just get a whole bunch online and minimize failures.

Also would be cool to have a dashboard that at least shows the latest data on all this. What's created, what's not, what's online, etc.

@whoabuddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this out as we've implemented a solution in the backend instead

@whoabuddy whoabuddy closed this Aug 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants