Fixing typo in documentation

[shrutiiiyet]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated POST /members API example to use provider value “credentials” (replacing “local”), aligning with current authentication terminology.
  • Clarifies expected request payload for client integrations to reduce confusion.
  • No functional changes; request/response behavior remains unchanged.
  • Minor formatting cleanup at end of file.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Updated the POST /members inline documentation in src/routes/members.ts to change the example provider value from "local" to "credentials". No functional code changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Docs update in members route src/routes/members.ts	Updated POST /members example to use provider: "credentials"; adjusted trailing newline; no logic or API behavior changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Minor fixes #38 — Makes provider a required field and passes it into member creation; aligns with this doc example update.
• Added conditional routing to get approved members route #18 — Introduces/uses "provider" with value "credentials" in member creation; directly related to the example change.

Suggested reviewers

• Harish-Naruto
• i-am-that-guy

Poem

A nibble, a note, a tiny revise,
Provider flips names—no code in disguise.
I hop through docs with whiskers keen,
"credentials" now, where "local" had been.
Small change, big grin—carrots for the win! 🥕🐇

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Title Check	❓ Inconclusive	The title indicates a documentation correction but is too generic to convey the actual change of updating the API example for the POST /members endpoint and changing the provider value from “local” to “credentials”, so it does not provide sufficient context for understanding the primary change.	Consider renaming the title to something more specific such as “Update provider value from ‘local’ to ‘credentials’ in POST /members documentation” to clearly highlight the key change.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch documenatation

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e5f1c95 and b6096b8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/routes/members.ts (2 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/routes/members.ts (1)

199-199: LGTM!

Adding a newline at the end of the file follows standard coding practices and improves compatibility with various tools.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}