Update getInterviews apidoc

[Sherin-2711]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Interviews API endpoint now supports pagination and verdict-based filtering capabilities.

• Documentation

  • Enhanced API documentation with comprehensive parameter details and expanded response examples.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The GET /interviews API documentation is updated to reflect pagination and verdict filtering capabilities. The route binding remains unchanged, but the JSDoc now includes parameter details (page, limit, verdict), expanded response fields, and comprehensive examples.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
API Documentation Update src/routes/interviews.ts	Updated GET /interviews API documentation with pagination (page, limit) and optional verdict filtering parameters, expanded success/error response shapes, and detailed examples.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

This change is purely documentation-focused with no functional logic modifications. The review involves verifying that the JSDoc accurately describes pagination behavior, parameter constraints, response schemas, and example payloads.

Possibly related PRs

• Add Interview Filters #52: Implements the pagination and verdict filtering logic in interview.controller and interview.service that this documentation now describes.
• Interview pagination #50: Implements pagination in the controller/service layer with updated getInterviews signature and response shape.
• Refactor routes and improve error handling; added health check endpoint; and removed comments #39: Also modifies src/routes/interviews.ts; coordinates router factory and JSDoc changes.

Suggested reviewers

• i-am-that-guy
• Harish-Naruto

Poem

🐰 Hop through the docs with joy and cheer,
Pagination filters crystal clear,
Verdicts sorted, page by page,
API documentation takes the stage! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: updating API documentation for the getInterviews endpoint.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch update-apidoc

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

src/routes/interviews.ts (1)

36-63: Make the success example valid JSON (remove inline comment)

The @apiSuccessExample block currently includes a // member not returned... line inside the JSON snippet, which makes it invalid JSON when copy‑pasted. Consider dropping that inline comment and, if needed, explaining the behavior in prose outside the JSON example.

You can minimally fix the snippet like this:

- *       "content": "Challenging rounds...",
- *       "isAnonymous": true
- *       // member not returned because isAnonymous = true
+ *       "content": "Challenging rounds...",
+ *       "isAnonymous": true

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 715c08d and f7ffcd0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/routes/interviews.ts (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/routes/interviews.ts (1)

8-74: Implementation matches documented behavior—verification complete

The controller correctly:

• Accepts page, limit, and verdict with defaults (page=1, limit=10, verdict="All").
• Enforces ranges (page >= 1, 1 <= limit <= 100).
• Validates verdict against ["All","Selected","Rejected","Pending"].
• Returns all documented fields at the top level: success, data, page, limit, verdict, total, and totalPages.

The implementation and documentation are in sync.

Minor note: The JSON example (line 36–63) contains an inline comment (// member not returned...), which is not valid JSON syntax. Consider either removing it or converting it to an adjacent prose note for clarity.