Skip to content

Conversation

@gmorales96
Copy link
Contributor

@gmorales96 gmorales96 commented Mar 7, 2025

Description:

This PR adds an optional response: Optional[dict] = None field to the UserListsValidation class. This field will allow storing additional response data related to user list validations.

Changes:

  • Added response: Optional[dict] = None to UserListsValidation.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced user validation by allowing additional response data for richer feedback.
    • Introduced a method to filter user matches based on specific criteria.
  • Chore
    • Updated the application version to 2.1.2.
  • Tests
    • Expanded automated test coverage to verify and support the new validation response capabilities.
    • Added assertions to ensure correct behavior of user validation based on new response data.

@gmorales96 gmorales96 requested a review from alexviquez as a code owner March 7, 2025 23:45
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new optional attribute response of type Optional[dict] in the UserListsValidation class to allow storing additional response data. A new property method ppe_matches has been added to filter and return a list of persons from the response attribute based on specific criteria. The project version has been updated from 2.1.0 to 2.1.2, with the CLIENT_VERSION adjusted accordingly while the API_VERSION remains unchanged. A new YAML file defining a series of HTTP interactions for user creation validation has been added to support automated testing scenarios. Additionally, a new test function named test_create_user_validation_with_response has been incorporated to verify the behavior of the updated user validation process, along with an assertion added to an existing test function to check the length of ppe_matches.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro (Legacy)

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c426f1b and 96ffaa7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cuenca/version.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • cuenca/version.py

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (4a0c538) to head (96ffaa7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #417   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           50        50           
  Lines         1118      1124    +6     
=========================================
+ Hits          1118      1124    +6     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
cuenca/resources/user_lists_validation.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
cuenca/version.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4a0c538...96ffaa7. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@alexviquez alexviquez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

solo actualiza la versión a la correcta y se va

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
__version__ = '2.1.0'
__version__ = '2.1.3.dev0'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bump version

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
__version__ = '2.1.0'
__version__ = '2.1.3'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2.1.1

@alexviquez alexviquez merged commit fe2eb3e into main Mar 13, 2025
18 checks passed
@alexviquez alexviquez deleted the feature/add-response-to-userlistsvalidation branch March 13, 2025 20:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants