Skip to content

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github May 5, 2023

Bumps github/codeql-action from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3.

Changelog

Sourced from github/codeql-action's changelog.

CodeQL Action Changelog

[UNRELEASED]

No user facing changes.

2.3.3 - 04 May 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.13.1. #1664
  • You can now configure CodeQL within your code scanning workflow by passing a config input to the init Action. See Using a custom configuration file for more information about configuring code scanning. #1590

2.3.2 - 27 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.3.1 - 26 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.3.0 - 21 Apr 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.13.0. #1649
  • Bump the minimum CodeQL bundle version to 2.8.5. #1618

2.2.12 - 13 Apr 2023

  • Include the value of the GITHUB_RUN_ATTEMPT environment variable in the telemetry sent to GitHub. #1640
  • Improve the ease of debugging failed runs configured using default setup. The CodeQL Action will now upload diagnostic information to Code Scanning from failed runs configured using default setup. You can view this diagnostic information on the tool status page. #1619

2.2.11 - 06 Apr 2023

No user facing changes.

2.2.10 - 05 Apr 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.12.6. #1629

2.2.9 - 27 Mar 2023

  • Customers post-processing the SARIF output of the analyze Action before uploading it to Code Scanning will benefit from an improved debugging experience. #1598
    • The CodeQL Action will now upload a SARIF file with debugging information to Code Scanning on failed runs for customers using upload: false. Previously, this was only available for customers using the default value of the upload input.
    • The upload input to the analyze Action now accepts the following values:
      • always is the default value, which uploads the SARIF file to Code Scanning for successful and failed runs.
      • failure-only is recommended for customers post-processing the SARIF file before uploading it to Code Scanning. This option uploads debugging information to Code Scanning for failed runs to improve the debugging experience.
      • never avoids uploading the SARIF file to Code Scanning even if the code scanning run fails. This is not recommended for external users since it complicates debugging.
      • The legacy true and false options will be interpreted as always and failure-only respectively.

2.2.8 - 22 Mar 2023

  • Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.12.5. #1585

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 29b1f65 Merge pull request #1669 from github/update-v2.3.3-318bcc7f8
  • 140500d Update changelog for v2.3.3
  • 318bcc7 Merge pull request #1664 from github/update-bundle/codeql-bundle-20230428
  • f72bf5d Fix workflow formatting
  • 3346195 Merge branch 'main' into update-bundle/codeql-bundle-20230428
  • 8ca5570 Merge pull request #1666 from github/aeisenberg/readme-update
  • b1b3d00 Add link to changenote for custom config
  • d2f6dfd Merge pull request #1665 from github/aeisenberg/config-param
  • cba5616 Update CHANGELOG.md
  • 40c9593 Add changelog note
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update Github_actions code labels May 5, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@step-security-bot step-security-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find code comments generated by StepSecurity AI CodeReviewer below. As we have used multiple ways to analyze the diff, our bot will create multiple comments with code feedback

Code Reviewer Model Name: json_output

Code Comments

.github/workflows/scorecard-analysis.yml

[
{
"Severity": "Medium",
"Recommendation": "Use of ambiguous comment",
"Description": "Change '# Upload the results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard.' to '# Upload the CodeQL analysis results to GitHub’s code scanning dashboard.' to be more specific."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "None",
"Description": "No recommendations for this change."
},
{
"Severity": "Low",
"Recommendation": "None",
"Description": "No recommendations for this change."
}
]

For the code change provided, I have identified the following:

  1. Severity Medium: Use of ambiguous comment. The comment "# Upload the results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard." is not very specific and could lead to confusion. According to the book "Clean Code" by Robert C. Martin, comments should be used to clarify code that is difficult to understand, but they should not be a substitute for clear code. The recommendation is to change the comment to something more specific like "# Upload the CodeQL analysis results to GitHub's code scanning dashboard.".

  2. Severity Low: No recommendations. No issues were identified with the change itself.

  3. Severity Low: No recommendations. No issues were identified with the change itself.

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

[
  {
    "Severity": "Low",
    "Recommendation": "Update Initialize, Autobuild and Analyze actions to latest version",
    "Description": "The CodeQL tools for scanning and analysis should be kept up to date for better security and functionality. It is recommended to use the latest version of these actions."
  },
  {
    "Severity": "Low",
    "Recommendation": "Enable or add CodeQL tool cache",
    "Description": "Caching CodeQL tools can significantly speed up your analysis and save resources. It is recommended to enable or add codeql tool cache to your workflow."
  },
  {
    "Severity": "Medium",
    "Recommendation": "Avoid using sensitive environment variables as plain text",
    "Description": "Sensitive environment variables such as access tokens and keys should not be kept as plain text. It is recommended to use Github secrets, Hashicorp Vault or other secure credential storage and retrieval mechanisms, and add them as appropriate environment variables at runtime."
  },
  {
    "Severity": "Medium",
    "Recommendation": "Prevent Pull Request to execute secret-enabled workflows",
    "Description": "Workflows that use secrets should not be triggered on pull requests from forks, as these can be used to extract secrets. It is recommended to add a \"pull_request_target\" event instead of \"pull_request\" or limit triggers to \"push\" events only, if possible."
  }
]

All recommendations are based on authoritative sources such as the CodeQL documentation (Github), the 12 Factor App Methodology (12 Factor App) and the Docker documentation (Docker).

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us enhance the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on the comments generated by the bot. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. Thank you for your support!

Copy link
Contributor

@step-security-bot step-security-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please find code comments generated by StepSecurity AI CodeReviewer below.

Code Reviewer Model Name: beta

Code Comments

.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml

  • Upgrade CodeQL dependencies to latest version for better security.
  • Consider updating the query configuration to include custom queries if deemed necessary.
  • Consider adding a step to manually build compiled languages in case the Autobuild step fails.
  • None of the changes made in this patch seem to have any security implications.

.github/workflows/scorecard-analysis.yml

  1. It is good practice to include a comment explaining the purpose of the code block, such as why the Sarif file is being uploaded and what value it provides to the team.
  2. Use a specific tag version for the codeql-action/upload-sarif step to prevent unexpected changes or compatibility issues.
  3. Consider adding a step to verify the integrity of the Sarif file before uploading, such as a checksum check, to ensure that the data is not corrupted or tampered with.

Feedback

We appreciate your feedback in helping us enhance the service! To provide feedback, please use emojis on the comments generated by the bot. If you find the comments helpful, give them a 👍. If they aren't useful, kindly express that with a 👎. Thank you for your support!

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.48 ⚠️

Comparison is base (bf2b016) 68.88% compared to head (377c320) 68.40%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #392      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   68.88%   68.40%   -0.48%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines        1671     1671              
==========================================
- Hits         1151     1143       -8     
- Misses        399      409      +10     
+ Partials      121      119       -2     

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch from e81a29f to 1ef73a2 Compare May 7, 2023 18:51
Bumps [github/codeql-action](https://github.com/github/codeql-action) from 1.0.26 to 2.3.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](github/codeql-action@5f53256...29b1f65)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github/codeql-action
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch from 1ef73a2 to 377c320 Compare May 15, 2023 01:33
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Contributor Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github May 25, 2023

Superseded by #402.

@dependabot dependabot bot closed this May 25, 2023
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/github_actions/github/codeql-action-2.3.3 branch May 25, 2023 01:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update Github_actions code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants