Skip to content

Conversation

@marmistrz
Copy link
Contributor

@marmistrz marmistrz commented Jun 8, 2022

This ideally would be configurable but I don't see a straightforward and backwards compatible way of making it configurable. Perhaps a builder pattern would be what we need.

Build on top of #639, which I find more important.

I'm not sure what we should do for async-std, which doesn't have a time module.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants